Makers and Takers : The Rise of Finance and the Fall of American BusinesseBook - 2016
In looking at the forces that brought our current administration to power one thing is clear: much of the population believes that our economic system is rigged to enrich the privileged elites at the expense of hard-working Americans. This is a belief held equally on both sides of political spectrum, and it seems only to be gaining momentum.
A key reason, says Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar, is the fact that Wall Street is no longer supporting Main Street businesses that create the jobs for the middle and working class. She draws on in-depth reporting and interviews at the highest rungs of business and government to show how the "financialization of America"--the phenomenon by which finance and its way of thinking have come to dominate every corner of business--is threatening the American Dream.
Now updated with new material explaining how our corrupted financial system propelled Donald Trump to power, Makers and Takers explores the confluence of forces that has led American businesses to favor balance-sheet engineering over the actual kind, greed over growth, and short-term profits over putting people to work. From the cozy relationship between Wall Street and Washington, to a tax code designed to benefit wealthy individuals and corporations, to forty years of bad policy decisions, she shows why so many Americans have lost trust in the system, and why it matters urgently to us all.
Through colorful stories of both "Takers," those stifling job creation while lining their own pockets, and "Makers," businesses serving the real economy, Foroohar shows how we can reverse these trends for a better path forward.
From the critics
QuotesAdd a Quote
Former Novartis Pharma-Unit Head Joins Venture-Capital Firm
Novartis’s former pharmaceuticals head has joined a biotech-focused venture-capital firm, in what is becoming a well-trodden path for drug-industry bosses.
This headline from the Wall Street Journal should be all you need to know about the corrupt and incestuous relationship between the real world and the the world of finance.
And yet, by increasing inequality and undermining economic growth over the last several decades, financialization has actually only made those questions [of who gets what in our society] more pressing. . . .
"The one percent in America right now is still a bit lower than the one percent in prerevolutionary France but is getting closer." -- Thomas Piketty.
"We've indulged [ourselves] in this fiction that we can build a vibrant economy by deregulating the financial sector, and cutting taxes, and putting off investments in things like infrastructure and education and our kids." -- Senator Warren.
During my reporting for this book, one consultant who worked with the firm joked to me that Pfizer was really a "financial strategy in the form of a company," since it made most of its revenues acquiring other firms that actually knew how to create drugs, rather than investing in its own drug discovery. Another consultant said that Pfizer would be better off taking all the money it spent on R&D and burning it to heat its buildings in winter, given the general level of payoff from the firm's own research efforts.
Bogle [founder of Vanguard]: "I remember one of the guys from some big [fund manager] firm said, 'We all know what you're trying to do, Jack. Why don't you just leave it to the markets? Leave it to Adam Smith's Invisible Hand[?]!'
"And I said, 'Don't you realize that we [mutual fund managers] ARE Adam Smith's Invisible Hand?'"
"The staggering economies of scale that characterize money management have been largely arrogated by fund managers TO THEMSELVES, rather than shared with their fund shareholders," concludes Bogle [founder of Vanguard]. (My emphasis)
Or, as the great economist Paul Samuelson put it presciently in 1967 [! ! !], "I decided that there was only one place to make money in the mutual fund business -- as there is only one place for a temperate man to be in a saloon, behind the bar and not in front of the bar. And I invested in . . . [a] management company."
If the markets are an ocean, private equity firms like Blackstone are the great white sharks that have perfected the use of debt, leverage, asset stripping, tax avoidance, and legal machinations to maximize profits for themselves at the expense of almost everyone else -- their investors, their limited partners, their portfolio companies and the workers in them, and certainly society at large.
Yet private equity brings its own very significant risks to the housing market, as well as a business model that is the very epitome of financialization -- one where the only motive is profit for its own sake, not wealth creation in the broader economy. . . .a business model that is designed to extract as much wealth from every target company with as little capital or risk to themselves as possible.
. . . the percentage of Americans who can call themselves homeowners is still declining from its peak in 2004, and many experts expect it to fall further as credit continues to be tight, young people struggle with higher-than-average levels of unemployment, and baby boomers begin moving into retirement housing.
Fixing this housing crisis, as Warren Buffett once told me, is a fundamental prerequisite for fixing our economy.
The national housing market is in recovery, but. . .it is incredibly bifurcated. . . .the top 10 percent richest markets, ranked by the aggregate value of owner-occupied homes, held 52 percent of housing wealth, equivalent to nearly $4.4 trillion. The bottom 40 percent, by contrast, held only 8 percent.
. . .one Fitch analyst said that "the growth is being propelled by INSTITUTIONAL MONEY" rather than the growing wealth of households. (my emphasis)
The CFTC [Commodities Futures Trading Commission] has certainly done its best to make it harder for US financial institutions to hang their dirty laundry in the Caribbean.
As if Wall Street's ability to buy as many grain or oil futures as it wants -- often with our retirement money -- and contribute to run-away inflation weren't enough, there's another problematic wrinkle that finance has brought to the commodities market: Today bankers can both trade commodities AND buy up the physical goods being traded. . . .
It. . . puts them in direct competition with the businesses that actually need such raw materials to make products. . . The financialialization of commodities markets means that AMERICAN BUSINESS NOW HAS TO COMPETE WITH ITS OWN BANKERS.
AgeAdd Age Suitability
There are no ages for this title yet.
SummaryAdd a Summary
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.