Tess

Tess

DVD - 2004
Average Rating:
8
1
Rate this:
A timeless adaptation of Thomas Hardy's classic romance. Tess Darbeyville, a beautiful young peasant, seeks her fortune with the wealthy D'Urbervilles, whom her family believes to be distant relatives.
Publisher: [United States] : Columbia Pictures, [2004]
Edition: Special ed. widescreen.
ISBN: 9781404940116
1404940111
Branch Call Number: DVD Tess
Characteristics: 1 videodisc (172 min.) :,sd., col. ;,4 3/4 in.

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

m
ms_mustard
Nov 12, 2016

one of the best of the class of slow films.

I watched Malick's Days of Heaven recently, which is somewhat reminiscent of Tess, and I think Tess is the better of the two.

I've never been tempted to read Hardy but greatly enjoyed the retelling.

not betrayed by its 37 years

f
Fuzzy_Wuzzy
Sep 13, 2015

As beautifully photographed and finely acted as "Tess" may have been, at a gruelling 3-hour running time, its pace was far too passive for it to securely hold one's rapt attention right through to its tragic ending.

Set during the Victorian period (in Dorset, England), "Tess" was adapted for the screen (by director Roman Polanski) from Thomas Hardy's 1891 novel, Tess of the D'Urbervilles.

The sensuously beautiful Nastassja Kinski (at 18) played the title role of the strong-willed peasant girl, Tess.

Events in the story are set into motion innocently enough when a local clergyman informs a simple farmer, John Durbeyfield, that the town historian has linked his lineage to actual descendants of the D'Urbervilles, a noble family whose ancestry goes all the way back to William the Conqueror.

"Tess", which was filmed in 1979, won Oscars for cinematography, art direction and costume design.

j
jessadam2
Jun 08, 2015

As 34 years goes by. Nastassja Kinski's Beauty remains Timeless. I fall in Love with her all over again for 3hours and 6min. She is 19 in this one. I was 19 in June of 1981when I went to see Tess some 6 to 7 times. It still remains my most Theater watched movie. This was Roman's Sharon fav.book. He dedicates it to her in the films beginning. The calender of 1981 matches perfectly to this years.... June 8,2015 3:08p.

f
finn75
Nov 17, 2014

Lush, beautiful and tragic. Makes you glad to be born in this century.

s
Salubri
Jul 12, 2014

Acting was decent, but I found this to be a rather slow movie. It could have been so much better.

d
DASTardlyGal
Oct 02, 2012

I read the book and found it so boring, tedious, and I was cursing Tess for her stupidity, although, i had realize the time period she lived in. Was really wanting to see Roman Polanski's version of it, found it to be almost word for word from the novel, but I found the movie beautiful and a movie I would watch again and again. Loved the movie MORE than the book, go figure. I am really glad that Mr. Polanski stuck so closely to the book and didn't stray like so many books turned to movies tend to do. Very lovely movie. Wish Sharon Tate had lived and maybe she could of gotten to play the part of Tess because she's the reason Mr. Polanski made the movie.

abbeysong Jun 28, 2012

I can't agree with ausnos (May 9) on this one. Hardy's "Tess of the D'Urbervilles" is one of my favourite novels of all time -- so tactile, so utterly sensual -- and Polanski's rendition of it is unsurpassed. When I re-read "Tess" a couple of months ago, I found it hard to separate my reading of it from the images in this decades-old film, although I'd watched another version more recently. I HAVE heard that the transfer into DVD was problematic (sound quality being one of the issues) and I haven't yet seen the DVD. I plan to as soon as possible.

a
ausnos
May 09, 2012

I have not read this book, but whilst watching the film I was expecting "more" from it. For example, Tess just didn't seem real to me. It sounded as if she were mumbling her words. I don't know if its in her character to speak like this but the act grew tired on me. Secondly, some scenes felts rushed. The seduction of Tess by Alec did not feel intense, and the pregnancy and birth of their child was not depicted. Furthermore, the child's death and the affects it had on Tess was at a total loss due to its weak depiction. I know this is a powerful story but how Roman Polanski chose to show it was much too weak caliber.

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at My Library

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top